It just so happens that in the Hugin drop-down menu of projections, there is "Equirectangular Panini" and it does exactly what I want, given the lens horizontal field of view (HFOV) that I input. I really appreciate all the help given here so far and I'm currently experimenting with FFMPEG as suggested above by CartolaĪlso, I'd like to point out that I want a PANINI equirectangular projection (or an adjustable Panini), not a plain Equirectangular projection. It would be nice to convert an 8 minute video shot at 60fps without having to convert it to 28,800 JPEGS and then convert it back to video. The only reason I'm using Hugin is because it does exactly what I need, but only to single frames, one at a time. I do my editing in Adobe Premiere/After Effects CS6.
#Hugin defish mac
I'm on a Mac but I have access to Windows machines.
#Hugin defish how to
Now I have to figure out how to call nona from the command line on my MacĪvisynth looks very interesting. #hugin_outputLDRExposureLayersFused false # specify variables that should be optimized That way, you just explode the video into a directory, If you get clever with the script, it could scan a directory and processĪll files in it. The pto, processes it, and saves the output file with the proper name. PHP (though I would imagine python or even bash might be a bit simpler).īasically, you need a script that loops over every frame file, generates
pto file using any scripting language, even pto files because Hugin needs all of them? > folder, then create a thumbnail for each image in the list. > thumbnails on a website, I use PHP to make a list of all the images in a pto file using PHP or something? When I make pto file but surely there must be a better way than
But if I have a 5 minute video (some are even longer) > Thanks for the reply! Yes, I use Premiere CS6 and I can export the video to I also just found out I can import Pentax DNG raw images directly, rather than convert to tiff and THEN use Hugin.On Sun, at 05:14:30PM -0700, Robert Giordano wrote: I work with map files a lot and that was familiar, although it doesn't have a bunch of projections that I actually like to use when I do actual maps and some of the projections it does have produce hilariously bad results. I do like the map projection theme for the conversion from sphere to flat. That could be my inexperience with the program. I tried to stitch together a couple of images I made standing at one location and it didn't work very well. My plan is to do all the image correction work in Digital Camera Utility 5 and just do the defishing in Hugin, although I've not anywhere near explored the options in Hugin.Īgain, I did no image manipulation in DCU5, other than to convert to tiff. Main thing was to illustrate the fisheye correction results.
That also may be the result of the conversion from 16 bit/color tiff to 8 bit/color jpg. The 6826 x 5311 x 16 bit/color actual image results doesn't have the banding. Did you do that to downsize for here?Yes, I lowered the quality AND size to fit here. I see your "jpg quality" in the exif is at 35%. The banding in the sky seems a bit excessive.
0 kommentar(er)
